An Independent Research Imprint · Published Occasionally
Working Papers on
Pacific Sovereignty & Bilateral Architecture
Defensive options for middle powers in a period of dollar-system stress.
The North Pacific Strategy Initiative publishes reference-grade working papers on the financial, diplomatic, and infrastructure architecture available to middle powers seeking to diversify counterparty risk. The Initiative is editorially independent and not affiliated with any government, institution, or commercial entity.
Working papers are placed publicly under version control to enable transparent review by allied policy and academic communities. Named commentary is welcomed and may be incorporated into subsequent versions with attribution.
Current Working Paper
No. 4 · v1.0 · May 2026 · For Discussion
The Addition Paradox
An energy thesis for Canada.
Why the energy transition did not happen, why that is acceptable, and why Canada is uniquely positioned to win the forty years that follow. A record year for clean-energy deployment was also a record year for fossil combustion: the global system did not transition, it expanded. The paper documents that expansion, names the chokepoint migration from molecule concentration to mineral concentration, and argues that Canada — alone among the G7 — holds simultaneously the cleanest barrel, the largest per-capita clean electricity, the highest-grade uranium reserves, and Pacific-and-Atlantic deepwater export capacity. Released 15 May 2026.
Previous Working Papers
No. 3 · v1.0 · May 2026 · For Discussion
A Canada–Korea Pacific Defence-Industrial Corridor
Submarine procurement, industrial offsets, and the third rail of middle-power sovereignty.
A bilateral defence-industrial architecture pairing the Canadian Patrol Submarine Project with the Hanwha–Algoma Steel and Hanwha–APMA industrial-offset structures, anchored to the CKFTA institutional foundation, the October 2025 SDCP, and the 25 February 2026 Foreign and Defence (2+2) Ministerial Joint Statement, and integrated with the critical-minerals corridor that supplies the Korean HBM oligopoly powering the AI processor stack. Released May 2026, ahead of the 23 May 2026 ROK Navy operational demonstration at CFB Esquimalt and the June 2026 CPSP final-contractor decision. Completes the three-rail Pacific architecture (financial · energy & compute · defence-industrial) developed across NPSI Working Papers Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
No. 2 · v1.0 · May 2026 · For Discussion
A Canada–United States Energy and Compute Compact
Cooperative leverage in the AI-era continental grid.
A treaty-grade bilateral architecture pairing Canadian dispatchable generation with the U.S. grid through ultra-high-voltage transmission, siting AI training workloads on Canadian hydro-electric capacity, and preserving inference workloads at the U.S. urban edge. Structurally complementary to Working Paper No. 1; financed through the same supranational vehicle. Indigenous co-ownership designed in at issuance. Released May 2026, ahead of the CUSMA joint review of 1 July 2026.
No. 1 · v1.0 · May 2026 · For Discussion
The Bilateral Foundation
A thirty-year Canada–Korea sovereign bond as the architecture of middle-power independence.
Why Canada has the wrong number of friends, why the Bank of Canada–Bank of Korea swap line nobody talks about is the most important asset on the books, and how a thirty-year Canada–Korea co-issued sovereign bond — assembled from off-the-shelf instruments, priced as a spread over US Treasuries, with Indigenous co-ownership embedded at issuance — becomes the architecture of middle-power independence. The financial rail of the three-rail Pacific architecture. Indicative programme size US$25–40 billion.
The Initiative
What we publish
Reference-grade working papers on Pacific sovereignty and bilateral financial architecture. Each paper is editorially controlled, version-numbered, and rigorously sourced.
How we work
Working papers are maintained as public version-controlled documents on GitHub. Substantive comment, technical critique, and named response are welcomed, reviewed against editorial standards, and may be incorporated into subsequent versions with attribution.
What we are not
Not an advocacy organisation. Not a consultancy. Not a government affiliate. Not a commercial enterprise. Not a personal platform. Editorially independent and slow by design.
The framing discipline
The Initiative's working papers frame middle-power options as counterparty-risk diversification — additive to existing global financial infrastructure, defensive rather than provocative, rule-of-law compliant in every jurisdiction they touch.
→ Read more about the Initiative, methodology, and editorial standards.
Engage
To submit named commentary on a working paper — attributed responses of 500 to 1500 words suitable for publication — write to jesse@fitforgov.com. To file factual corrections, technical critiques, or proposed edits, open an Issue or Pull Request on the corresponding GitHub repository. Full contribution standards are described on the Engage page.